Resentment vs Contentment. A comparison between "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl" and "Up from Slavery."
.-~*'+Introduction+'*~-.
Hello, fellow Readers (A baker's dozen of people + Dr. E), and welcome to the AFAM-ILY blog's first post! This post will be discussing the texts: "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Seven Years Concealed" by Harriet Jacobs, and "Up from Slavery" by Booker T.Washington.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Today, I wanted to discuss the contrasts in Jacobs and Washington's attitudes towards Slavery, from their own respective experiences, such as people they met and events they went through, to their thoughts on being liberated from slavery. Let's first begin with Harriet Jacobs, who goes under the alias Linda Brent when recounting her narrative. As we know, after Brent's mother's mistress, a woman she regarded as kind and caring to her, had died, she came to find in her will that she would simply be sold off to The Flints. Immediately she's filled with distate, anger, and bitterness upon realizing freedom is beyond her reach, and she's placed at the mercy of a far more sinister family.
Daily, she is tormented not only by the abuse she faces herself, but by witnessing the abuse others simulteaneously. She never held an ounce of respect or gratitude toward any of her slave owners, even when she supposedly "had it easier" and underwent less grueling and lighter tasks than others. When she finally saw an opportunity, for 7 years did she 'escape,' and endured a bleak, and depressing existence inside of a dark garret. 7 years of blisteringly hot summers and piercingly cold winters. 7 years of limited mobility and exercise. 7 years quietly watching and listening to those who unknowingly passed her by. 7 years, and it was still a markedly better experience than being viewed as property and forced to work for the rest of her life.
She enjoyed the thought of Dr. Flint searching for her across the entire country, while she was right under his radar the entire time. Back before she left, she knew that having children with another man (Sands) would rob Dr. Flint in his attempts to rob her of her bodily autonomy. On page 162, she outright says "I cannot say, with truth, that the news of my old master's death softened my feelings towards him. There are wrongs which even the grave does not bury. The man was odious to me while he lived, and his memory is odious now."
She regrets nothing. And for that? She's more than valid for thinking as such
Photo of the Garrett that she lived in.
Booker T. Washington takes a difference stance when it comes to his attitude toward slavery. Washington is under the impression that the slaves around his plantation, even in a majority of the South had carried no resentment or bitterness towards their masters or other white people. Slaves would mourn the children of their masters should they fall ill or die, begging to nurse them or nurture them them once more. Some slaves would even put themselves in harm's way to protect their mistresses and their children, with a quote saying "Anyone attempting to harm 'young Mistress' or 'old Mistres' during the night would have to cross the body of the slave to do so." Washington also goes to cite instances where black slaves continued to nurse their former masters/mistresses who became impoverished and dependent folowing the war.
Saying a majority of slaves lacked contempt towards white people feels like quite the pressumptious claim to make, so it seems that Washington could be simply applying his own experiences to what he think others may think.
One thing that's worth noting is that on the first paragraph on the 11th page, he begins by saying "I pity from the bottom of my heart any nation or body of people that is so unfortunate as to get entangled in the net of slavery." Saying pitied, instead of something more akin to empathized, or even sympathized, even though he was a black slave strikes me as quite strange, as if he's an exception or an outsider or bystander. One possible theory is that maybe he only "pities" other nations with slavery because he saw the slavery seen at his plantation as more "tame" or "not as bad as others."
Later on in the text, Washington says he used to envy this hypothetical white boy. This boy wasn't stopped or limited from any dreams or aspirations, and could become anything he so pleased, from Bishop to President. Though he seemed to picture being in the shoes of someone with such privelege, he admits he didn't envy that boy as much as used to, and he claims soon after that being born as Black can be more advantageous than being born white. He says that Black people often "work harder and must perform his tasks even better than a white youth to secure recognition. But out of the hard and unusual struggle through which he is compelled to pass, he gets a strength, a confidence, that one misses whose pathways is comparatively smooth by reason of birth and race." For what I think about this, what he stated about Black people frequently having to work harder than white people for the same amount of recognition is in fact true, but I disagree with the part where one gains sort of a...mental fortitude because of this struggle for recognition. In fact, I feel that this would warrant a near opposite effect, in which Black people are under more stress and frustration, beginning to actually lack confidence because their skills are not seen as equal to someone white, when in reality they should be equals. This might resort to Black people having to sacrifice their own well-being, doing twice the work a white person does just to be treated the same.
I would like to mention his journey throughout University as a part of my point. He's smart, intelligent, and willing to learn what he can at this University despite being winded, dirty and tired from his long journey. He is forced to clean the area to an insane degree, where he's quadruple checking the places he has dusted, and only then is he granted entry. But it doesn't stop there, in order to pay for his room and board he basically becomes the janitor for the school, and isn't really seen as a proper student. Then for that Colonel(?) he meets, he's willing to move into a tent with little protection during the winter in order to make him happy, which also strikes me as...odd? Intriguing too.
I like the way you incorporated a bunch of quotes from the two texts. The stark contrast between these two characters' experiences in the world really shapes every detail about them and their recounts, from the way they view slavery to the way they think about people close to them like family and friends. Personally, I found the way you separated each main point into a separate paragraph really helpful when reading. Nice job.
ReplyDeleteThis is a thoughtful post, Willie! I agree that Washington carries less bitterness towards his experience in slavery than Linda. At first, I thought he was less resentful because he did not experience as many effects from slavery in his adult life as Linda. However, the conditions he had to learn under when he finally made it to the school show the everlasting effects slavery had on his life. Before reading your post, I focused more on their similarities, such as their determination to overcome the constraints set on them early on in life. However, I think your post provides meaningful insight towards their differences.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Willie! I also remember reading that passage with the word "pitited" and finding that a little strange. I agree with you that I think Booker T. Washington sees himself as the exception, and I especially think his mindset about gaining a fortitude because of "struggling more" and working harder is wrong. Overall, really great blog post I am looking forward to reading the next one!
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree that Booker T. Washington's depiction of the events of slavery, although most likely accurate to his own life, could problematically downplay the horrors of slavery by generalizing the slave-slaveowner dynamic as less hostile than it is depicted in other slave narratives such as Jacobs' "Incidents in the Life of Slave Girl". In doing so, it could convince readers that the lasting impact of slavery was not as big of an obstalce to the livelihood of African Americans as they thought, thereby discouraging bystanders and moderates from taking action. All in all, your post really helped me think more deeply about BTW's narrative, thanks!
ReplyDeleteI agree that there is a pretty striking difference between their attitudes toward slavery and Washington seems too eager to just forgive and is more interested in his education. He doesn't seem too interested in talking about slavery either, and I don't think he directly addresses it after the first 2 chapters. However, for Jacobs it plays a much bigger role and its presence dominates a significant part of her life, and she still lives with the memory of it throughout her life.
ReplyDeleteNice post, Willie! I agree with what you say in how there is a very big difference in how Booker viewed slavery in comparison with how Linda Brent viewed slavery, and I think this was definitely a standout factor between these two readings. Like you said in your blog, I found the use of the word "pitied" to be an interesting choice to describe slavery, almost as if he wasn't expressing any sympathy towards the other slaves, even though he himself had lived through enslavement.
ReplyDeleteAwesome post! I also noticed how much Booker T Washington tried to minimize his experiences in slavery. Even though he noted that he wished he could go to school like his enslavers, he failed to highlight the horrors that his family and friends went through while being enslaved. While his story is uplifting and true, it's almost impossible to just work your way up from slavery. His is a story of luck and of trying to conform to white norms. While I still look up to him and recognize what he has done and the fact that he was brought up in a much different time, I can't get behind some of the themes in his work.
ReplyDelete